← Back to Feed
contractsFlagged for ReviewState of Oregon·FY2025

$207,304

Oregon Pays California $207K for Fire Services with Vague Description

Oregon Department of Forestry

The Oregon Department of Forestry paid California's fire department $207,303 for undefined 'trade services' with only the cryptic description 'CAL FIRE 092425'. With Oregon's own forestry department handling the contract, it's unclear why this work couldn't be done in-state or what specific services were provided.

This item was flagged by our automated pipeline from public spending records. It represents a potential concern, not a confirmed finding of wrongdoing.

Concern Score Assessment

Concern Score: 65/100

Share This Record

See More Like This

contracts

$1.5B

Oregon Pays $1.5B for Fingerprinting Services from New Jersey Company

State Procurement Office

The State Procurement Office awarded a staggering $1.5 billion contract to a New Jersey company for electronic fingerprinting services over just 3 years. This appears to be either a data error or an astronomically overpriced contract for what should be routine background check services.

Concern Score: 85/100
Flagged for Review
State of Oregon
FY2014Read →
contracts

$5.5B

Oregon Pays $5.5 Billion to Idaho Individual for Medicaid Loan Program

OHA - Oregon Health Policy & Analytics

The Oregon Health Authority awarded a staggering $5.5 billion personal services contract to a single individual in Idaho for administering a Medicaid loan repayment program. This massive amount for what appears to be administrative work raises serious questions about contract oversight and whether this represents a data error or actual questionable spending.

Concern Score: 85/100
Flagged for Review
State of Oregon
FY2016Read →
contracts

$5B

Oregon Signs $5 Billion Auto Parts Deal with Georgia Company

DAS Procurement Services

DAS Procurement Services awarded a massive $5 billion auto parts contract to Genuine Parts Company in Atlanta, Georgia. This appears to be an astronomical amount for government vehicle parts, and raises questions about why an out-of-state vendor was chosen for what could likely be sourced locally.

Concern Score: 85/100
Flagged for Review
State of Oregon
FY2015Read →